Legal and General Knowledge : Legal Knowledge

Showing posts with label Legal Knowledge | Ayush Jaiswal |. Show all posts

30/09/2021

Case- Central Public Information Officer Vs. Subhash Chandra Agrawal, SC.

Held- 😯

👉 CJI falls under RTI (Right to information).

Decided on- 👉 13/11/2019.

Bench- 👇

5 Judges Constitution Bench.

👉 Ranjan Gagoi, NV Ramanna, Dr. Dy Chandrachud, Deepak Gupta and Sanjiv Khanna.

Case- Anuradha Bhasin Versus Union Of India and others

Held- 👇

Access to internet and free speech is part of Article 19(1).

Bench- 👉 N.V Ramanna, Subhas Reddy B.R Gavai.

29/09/2021

List of Chief Justices of India | भारत के मुख्य न्यायाधीशों की सूची | Ay...

List of all the Chief Justices of India

Name	Date of Appointment as C.J.I.	Held Office till
1. Hon’ble Justice Harilal Jekisundas Kania	26/01/1950	06/11/1951
2. Hon’ble Justice M. Patanjali Sastri	07/11/1951	03/01/1954
3. Hon’ble Justice Mehr Chand Mahajan	04/01/1954	22/12/1954
4. Hon’ble Justice Bijan Kumar Mukherjea	23/12/1954	31/01/1956
5. Hon’ble Justice Sudhi Ranjan Das	01/02/1956	30/09/1959
6. Hon’ble Justice Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha	01/10/1959	31/01/1964
7. Hon’ble Justice P.B. Gajendragadkar	01/02/1964	15/03/1966
8. Hon’ble Justice A.K. Sarkar	16/03/1966	29/06/1966
9. Hon’ble Justice K. Subba Rao	30/06/1966	11/04/1967
10.Hon’ble Justice K.N. Wanchoo	12/04/1967	24/02/1968
11. Hon’ble Justice M. Hidayatullah	25/02/1968	16/12/1970
12. Hon’ble Justice J.C. Shah	17/12/1970	21/01/1971
13. Hon’ble Justice S.M. Sikri	22/01/1971	25/04/1973
14. Hon’ble Justice A.N. Ray	26/04/1973	28/01/1977
15. Hon’ble Justice M. Hameedullah Beg	29/01/1977	21/02/1978
16. Hon’ble Justice Y.V. Chandrachud	22/02/1978	11/07/1985
17. Hon’ble Justice P.N. Bhagwati	12/07/1985	20/12/1986
18. Hon’ble Justice R.S. Pathak	21/12/1986	18/06/1989
19. Hon’ble Justice E.S. Venkataramiah	19/06/1989	17/12/1989
20. Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Mukherjee	18/12/1989	25/09/1990
21. Hon’ble Justice Ranganath Misra	25/09/1990	24/11/1991
22. Hon’ble Justice K.N. Singh	25/11/1991	12/12/1991
23. Hon’ble Justice M.H. Kania	13/12/1991	17/11/1992
24. Hon’ble Justice L.M. Sharma	18/11/1992	11/02/1993
25. Hon’ble Justice M.N. Venkatachaliah	12/02/1993	24/10/1994
26. Hon’ble Justice A.M. Ahmadi	25/10/1994	24/03/1997
27. Hon’ble Justice J.S. Verma	25/03/1997	17/01/1998
28. Hon’ble Justice M.M. Punchhi	18/01/1998	09/10/1998
29. Hon’ble Dr. Justice A.S. Anand	10/10/1998	31/10/2001
30. Hon’ble Justice S.P. Bharucha	01/11/2001	05/05/2002
31. Hon’ble Justice B.N. Kirpal	06/05/2002	07/11/2002
32. Hon’ble Justice G.B. Pattanaik	08/11/2002	18/12/2002
33. Hon’ble Justice V.N. Khare	19/12/2002	01/05/2004
34. Hon’ble Justice S. Rajendra Babu	02/05/2004	31/05/2004
35. Hon’ble Justice R.C. Lahoti	01/06/2004	31/10/2005
36. Hon’ble Justice Y.K. Sabharwal	01/11/2005	13/01/2007
37. Hon'ble Justice K.G. Balakrishnan	14/01/2007	12/05/2010
38. Hon'ble Justice S.H. Kapadia	12/05/2010	28/09/2012
39. Hon'ble Justice Altamas Kabir	29/09/2012	18/07/2013
40. Hon'ble Justice P. Sathasivam	19/07/2013	26/04/2014
41. Hon'ble Justice R. M. Lodha	27/04/2014	27/09/2014
42. Hon'ble Justice H.L. Dattu	28/09/2014	02/12/2015
43. Hon'ble T. S. Thakur	03/12/2015	03/01/2017
44. Hon'ble Jagdish Singh Khehar	04/01/2017	27/08/2017
45. Hon'ble Justice Dipak Misra	28/08/2017	02/10/2018
46. Hon'ble Ranjan Gogoi	03/10/2018	17/11/2019
47. Hon'ble Sharad Arvind Bobde	18/11/2019	23/04/2021
48. Hon'ble Nuthalapati Venkata Ramana	24/04/2021	26/08/2022

Case- Vineeta Sharma Vs. Rakesh Sharma

Held-

👉Cleared last hurdle towards gender equality in Hindu Property Law.

Date of Decision- 11/08/2020.

Bench- Arun Mishra, S. Abdul Nazeer and Mr. Shah.

Note- Its is not necessary that father coparcenor should be living as on 9/09/2005.

22/09/2021

Case- Mansha Ram Vs. Dhule Nagarpalika

Held-

👉 Ex-parte temporary injunction or any ex-parte temporary injunction shall be passed in exceptional condition.

👉Every ex-parte order shall be reasoned order.

Note-

👉There can not be a temporary injunction to prevent any person from filing a suit.

👉Anyone cannot claim injunction about any future right.

Case- Morgon Stanley Mutual Fund Vs. kartik Das, 1994 Supreme Court.

Held-

- Following guiding principles should be followed before granting ex-parte temporary injunction-

👉 General principles of temporary injunction.

👉The time at which the plaintiff first had notice of the act, complained or not.

👉Whether the refusal or ex-parte temporary injunction would involve greater injustice than the grant of ex-parte temporary injunction.

👉If plaintiff has ignored for some time, the Court would not grant ex-parte temporary injunction.

👉Application should be made in utmost good faith.

👉Exparte- temporary injunction must be for a limited period of time.

Case- Shrimati Ram Beti Vs. DPRO, 1998

Held-

👉 A pradhan can be removed by way of no confidence motion by the members of gram panchyat because members of Gram Panchyat are elected by tye Gram Sabha that's why it is deemed that removal of Pradhan by member of Gram Panchayat is the removal of Pradhan by Gram Sabha.

Case- Navtej Singh Johar Vs. Union Of India.

Held 👉 Supreme Court has given preference to constitutional morality over social morality.

21/09/2021

Case- Sumitra Devi Anand Vs. Shanti Devi, 2005 Supreme Court

Held-

👉 Injunction can be granted against a decree, if it is prove that decree is obtained by imposter. (छुपाकर)

👉 Case- Sunil Poddar Vs. Union Bank of India, 2008 Supreme Court.

Held-

👉 Where the Court orders service of summons by an advertisement in local daily newspaper, such service is an effective service even if the defendant is not subscriber of the newspaper or is not reading it.